![]() |
Swiss Mennonite Cultural and Historical Association |
| Home Origin History Monthly Feature Activities Board Anniversaries Store |
ONE HUNDRED years ago several thousand German-speaking people from Russia settled
on lands in Kansas and left a considerable impact upon the history of the state.
The purpose of this article is to examine some of the reasons for the move from
Russia, why Kansas became the chief host state, the distinguishing features of their
settlement and reception, and their contributions to the history of Kansas. Since
the scope of the subject and limitations of space will preclude a thorough analysis
of all aspects of the topic, the focus will be on a presentation of a general outline
of events, discussions of sources, and thoughts and questions concerning new approaches.
[1]
The Russian-Germans [2] who arrived in Kansas in the 1870’s settled in two main
geographical areas of the state that also correspond to separate places of origin
in Russia and, for the majority, to different religious backgrounds. The first to
arrive in large numbers, in 1874, were the Mennonites, mainly from the Tauride province
of South Russia, who concentrated in Marion, Harvey, and McPherson counties. The
other major area of settlement in Kansas, in Ellis, Russell, and Rush counties,
was colonized by the Volga Germans of Roman Catholic, Lutheran, and Baptist denominations.
Of course, many counties of western and central Kansas became the homes of Russian-Germans,
but many of these came later and often involved people who immigrated first to other
states or to Canada, Mexico, or South America.
The Russian-German immigrants were distinctive in several respects from other newcomers
to the prairie in the 19th century. First of all, they moved in large groups, settling
whole areas, founding their own social and religious communities. Strong religious
faith and attachment to particular customs gave these people greater ability to
sustain the difficulties of a long trip and reduced the shock of adaptation. That
is, unlike most settlers and immigrants, the Russian-Germans maintained, and perhaps
even strengthened, their community consciousness. In this respect the Russian-Germans
of all denominations resembled the Amish, Hutterite, Mormon, and other religious
groups who made the North American frontier their homes.
The new arrivals from Russia were also similar to religious sects in the fact that
they were separated from a developing national consciousness for so long. They had
not lived in Germany during the 19th century, the age of nationalism, but in colonies
within a particularly non-German society, preserving the customs and traditions
of Slavic social and economic institutions. Most of the Russian-Germans, who came
to Kansas could, in fact, speak some Russian as well as German. The differences
in appearance, manners, and language from other German immigrants were so great
that people on the scene quickly and easily referred to them as Russians or "Rooshians."
To obtain a basic understanding of these people it is important to examine in some
detail where they came from and why they left.
The Russian-Germans were not the only people of Germanic ancestry residing in the
Russian Empire in the 19th century. Germans formed an important part of the merchant
population of Moscow and St. Petersburg, and another large German ethnic group was
absorbed as the result of territorial expansion, particularly in the 18th century.
The "native" Germans consisted mostly of the "Baltic" Germans living in what are
now the Soviet republics of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. By contrast, the "Russian"
Germans were those who migrated to Russia to farm, beginning in the reign of Catherine
the Great (1762-1796) and continuing through the first third of the next century.
The first territory to be settled by these Germans was on both sides of the middle
Volga River near the cities of Samara and Saratov. Catherine the Great was interested
in the agricultural development of this region and the pacification of an unruly
frontier when she first issued the invitation for foreigners to colonize in 1762.
A subsequent manifesto of July 1763 promised free lands, expenses for the move,
freedom from taxation for 30 years, and exemption from civil and military service
for themselves and their descendants. The empress’s agents recruited settlers especially
from the poorer German states devastated by the Seven Years’ War. [3]
Several thousand colonists, usually from towns rather than villages, both Roman
Catholic and Lutheran, accepted the Russian invitation and made the long trek eastward
across Russia to the Volga. Under haphazard military supervision and through the
turmoil of the Pugachev revolt (1773-1775) they suffered great hardships, but by
the beginning of the 1800’s, under the more lenient supervision of a special office
of the Ministry of Interior, the Volga Germans prospered, at least relative to the
Russian peasantry in general. Others joined them, especially during the Napoleonic
wars, and by the 1860’s they numbered around 250,000, approximately the then population
of the state of Kansas, and dominated the economic life of two of the Russia’s most
productive agricultural provinces;Samara and Saratov.
Another area, in South Russia, was opened to colonial settlement after Russian acquisition
of the Black Sea Coast and especially after the annexation of the Crimea in 1783-1784,
by which a large expanse of thinly inhabited steppe became part of the Russian Empire.
Prince Gregory Potemkin, Catherine’s lover and favorite, was particularly interested
in attracting farmer of proven industry to help develop the economic potential of
this region called "New Russia." And in addition to Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbs, and
other peoples from southeastern Europe, he invited a large number of Mennonites,
particularly from the area around Danzig that had fallen under Prussian control
as a result of the partitioning of Poland. Coming under heavy pressure from the
modernizing ambitions of Frederick the Great to pay taxes and furnish recruits,
the Mennonites there decided to accept the Russian conditions of 1763, which were
even improved by negotiation to include a substantial subsidy for each family; many
more followed after the disruptions of the Napoleonic wars in central and northern
Europe. Unlike the Volga Germans, the Mennonites generally moved as religious communities
with years of agricultural experience behind them. Many were, in fact, Dutch or
Swiss in cultural and linguistic heritage rather than German proper. [4]
The two largest Mennonite colonial areas of South Russia were Khortitsa, on the
Dnieper river about 175 miles northwest of the port of Berdiansk (now Osipnenko)
on the Sea of Azov, and Molochna, centered around the market town of Halbstadt,
about 90 miles from Berdiansk. Other settlements were scattered along the Black
Sea coast, in the Crimea, in Bessarabia, and in Russian Poland. The total Mennonite
Russian-German population of "New Russia" was about 40,000 by 1869, half of whom
lived in the Molochna colony, while the number in all of the Russian Empire was
probably not over 75,000. [5] They fulfilled Potemkin’s original expectations, developing
a widely diversified agrarian economy that included orchards, dairying, sheep herding,
silk culture, and, of course, the raising of grain. By the middle of the 19th century,
their wheat production had become a significant part of Russia’s Black Sea exports
to Western Europe. Mennonite entrepreneurs were handling and processing their own
products for the Russian or foreign markets, and the Mennonite "oases" of South
Russia (as they were referred to in contemporary Russian accounts) were relatively
prosperous.
Though much of the economic and social history of the German settlements in Russia
remains to be written, major achievements appear to have been accomplished in those
areas. Why, then, did many Russian-Germans decide to move to a new, unknown land?
The reason most often cited is that the exemption, which all had enjoyed, from military
service was being withdrawn and that the Mennonites in particular, as conscientious
objectors, could not tolerate the change in status. It is true, and somewhat ironic,
that the Russian government in a liberal-rational course of modernization after
the Crimean War was attempting to treat all people living within the Russian boundaries
equally, and the new military reform law, devised to create modern, efficient armed
forces and which went into effect in 1874, did propose to make everyone, noble and
peasant Russian for foreign in origin, subject to the draft. The removal of the
special exemption must be considered at least as a catalyst for the idea of emigration.
The fact is, however, that only a portion of the Mennonites, and an even smaller
percentage of the Volga Germans, actually left Russia at this time. In the case
of the Roman Catholics and Lutherans there were no religious scruples against military
service, and, of the Mennonites that remained, probably none actually served in
the Russian army before the Russian Revolution, since, after several frustrating
efforts to settle the issue with the government in St. Petersburg, the Mennonites
obtained a compromise that made it possible for they to serve in alternate forestry
work under their own administration. [6]
Those who could not claim a right to alternate service were subject to the new recruitment,
and the first were drafted during the annual November processing in 1874. Hostility
to serve in the Russian army was quite high, however, because of the conditions
that prevailed for recruits, perhaps exaggerated by rumor, bias against advancement
for non-Russians, and the predominance of Russian Orthodox religious services. [7]
Despite this situation, which would become much worse in the 1890’s, the priority
of the removal of military exemption as a cause of emigration needs more substantiation
than has been offered in the past, and other political, religious, and socio-economic
factors should be weighed. It is interesting to observe, for example, that the arriving
immigrants in Kansas did not appear to include a particularly large number of recruitment
age.
Politically, the status of the Russian-German colonies was being closely examined
in the middle of the 19th century by the imperial government, and the inhabitants
could probably not avoid becoming suspicious and restless when on Russian surveying
team after another came through their territory. Beginning especially in the 1840’s
with their transfer to the new Ministry of State Domains, the central government
began to treat the colonists more and more as Russian state peasants. The reform
movement of the 1850’s and 1860’s shook the fabric of Russian-German society as
well as that of the rest of Russia. Efforts to equalize landholdings among the agricultural
population in the peasant emancipation (beginning in 1861) affected the Russian-Germans,
especially the Mennonites, whose landholding statistics reflected a wide disparity;from
the several thousand-acre estates of Jansen, Miller, Cornies, Shroeder, Peters,
etc. to the many landless, poor families, who, according to Russian records of 1865,
included one third of the total Mennonite colonists. [8] By a series of government
decrees, the richer colonists were being forced to contribute land and supplies
for the less fortunate, despite the existence of relief programs within the communities,
and Russian courts were examining titles closely for illegal alienation of land
that might have resulted since the original grants. Speculation was current that
a single family should have only the amount of the first awards, about 175 acres.
[9] In any event, the result was a marked increase in Russian interference in the
internal life of the Russian-German communities in 1860’s. This caused particular
concern within the central organizations in South Russia, The New Russian Mennonite
Brotherhood and the Halbstadt Agricultural Society, and may account for the active
leadership for emigration by prosperous leaders such as Cornelius Jansen and Bernard
Warkentin. [10] Separate schools and social and economic autonomy in general were
being threatened in addition to the military exemption.
While new political currents were very much in evidence in Russia in the 1860’s,
religious changes were also occurring in a complex, interacting process. West European
pietism reached the Mennonite colonies in the 1840’s, and by 1870 a number of church
communities had been fragmented by religious controversy. And the revival of sectarianism
even influenced the more remote Roman Catholic and Lutheran colonies, where the
German Baptist and Methodist movements gained converts. Disputes over church doctrine
added to the impulse to get away and start over;to make a trek;which was already
a part of the Mennonite tradition of founding daughter colonies. One group of Mennonites,
the Hüpferites, left Molochna for a new territory in the Russian Caucasus in 1865,
but initial reports on conditions there were discouraging. [11] A split in the Alexanderwohl
church in the 1860’s was apparently a prime cause of the transplantation of a large
part of that Molochna community to Kansas. And the Krimmer Mennonite Brethren was
an other offshoot of the 1860’s that joined the emigration. Perhaps a thorough analysis
of the religious affairs of the Russian-Germans would result in the conclusion that
they were the most important cause of emigration.
A Russian source (Klaus) emphasizes the relationship of the pietist movement to
poorer economic conditions. There may be an interconnection, but none is readily
apparent in the Russian-Kansas migration. More relevant are the socio-economic conditions
prevailing in Russia around 1870. That Russia at this time was a backward, agricultural
country is generally recognized. The growth of rural population was quite rapid
in the middle decades of the 19th century, caused especially by the lowering of
the death rate through, for example, decreasing the incidence of cholera epidemics.
And few new frontiers were open in European Russia that could be cultivated by existing
methods. Population pressure (or land hunger) affected the Russian-Germans perhaps
higher and death rates lower due to better living conditions. One must remember
in this context that the German colonists were not affected by military recruitment
and the forced or voluntary labor migrations that relieved some of the pressure
from Russian villages.
The colonies of South Russia, however, were generally in better condition than those
of the Volga, because of their proximity to the Black Sea ports and larger per capita
allotments of land. According to the Russian census of 1858, Volga villages such
as Pfeifer and Herzog averaged 15 acres of land for each male inhabitant, while
Alexanderwohl, a typical Mennonite community, had about 30 acres for each male.
An average family holding in the Volga region was around 35 acres and in South Russia
over 100 acres. [12] On the other hand, although wealthy landholders can be found
among the Volga Germans, equality of farm size was much more prevalent there because
of more widespread use of the Russian communal land tenure that provided for a re-division
of village land periodically. By contrast, in the Molochna area, 32 Mennonite families
owned 250,000 acres in 1860 and hired several thousand Mennonite and Russian laborers.
[13] The Mennonite landless complained to local Russian authorities about their
situation, but the result was greater Russian interference and the setting up of
more communal land associations, which probably frustrated both rich and poor.
Besides the land-population crisis, all colonists suffered from declining grain
prices due to increased competition from the United States, tax rises (25% between
1840 and 1868), and the withdrawal of economic privileges such as exclusive licenses
for the brewing of beer. [14] Another factor that needs closer study is the effect
of the death in the 1860’s of Joann Cornies, long time patriarch of the South Russian
Mennonites who had considerable influence with the government in St. Petersburg.
[15]
One escape remained open, and it may have been the Russians who first brought this
to their attention. In 1864 an offer, directed especially to the landless Mennonites,
of free land, reduced taxes, and guaranteed exemption from military serve was made
to those who would move to Eastern Siberia, to the newly acquired Amur river basin.
Some, such as Bernard Warkentin, Sr., seriously considered this possibility and
made an inspection trip to Siberia, but the remoteness of the land and lack of railroads
for exporting grain discouraged further pursuit. [16] Besides, the logistics of
such a move would be just as great, perhaps greater, than a move to Kansas.
By 1870, before the terms of the military reform law were known, a number of factors
stirred the Russian-German colonies and stimulated projects for movement, and leaders
were beginning to discuss the possibilities; Canada, Brazil, the Near East, as well
as the United States. German language newspapers circulating in both South Russia
and the Volga region brought information about immigration, and the Russian government,
still of a relatively liberal disposition, made it clear that those Russian-Germans
who were not satisfied with their status (as confused as it was) were free to leave
the country, an attitude that would later change. But with so much of the world
open to them, how did it happen that a large portion of the first Russian-German
emigrants came to Kansas?
- end of Part I of IV-
copyright 2000-2005
|
Home Origin History Monthly Feature Activities Board Anniversaries Store |